What does the JSLint error 'body of a for in should be wrapped in an if statement' mean?
The JSLint error "body of a for in should be wrapped in an if statement" appears when you use a for...in
loop without a corresponding hasOwnProperty
check. Here's how to avoid it:
In a nutshell, the hasOwnProperty
function includes only the object's own properties, excluding inherited ones.
Going beyond surface: for...in loops
JavaScript's for...in
loop traverses over an object's properties. It, however, includes inherited properties due to JavaScript's prototype-based inheritance, a phenomenon that can lead to some spooky, unexpected results. 👻
Array vs Objects: Choose your weapon
for...in
might be tempted to iterate over an array, but resist. Arrays and traditional for loops are a perfect duo. For key-value structures, for...in
with a hasOwnProperty
filter is your go-to choice:
Defensive programming: Play it safe, kid
Your best defense against potential horror movie material includes:
- Prototype Invasion: Safety first! Keep an eye out for unexpected properties sneaking in while using libraries or frameworks that extend prototypes.
- Inheritance Inspections: Engage
hasOwnProperty
to sift out inherited properties, keeping focus on the object's personal belongings. - Strict Comparison: JavaScript is a loose cannon. Ensure to use
===
to avoid type coercion blindsides.
jQuery for the save
If jQuery is a part of your toolkit, enjoy a clean ride with $.each()
:
However, JavaScript isn't the wild west anymore. Stannis-approved official functions like Object.keys
, Object.entries
, and array iteration functions offer safer alternatives.
ES6: Future is here
With ES6, the Object.keys()
and Object.entries()
methods allow safe traversal over an object's properties, almost rendering for...in
loops obsolete.
For a solid, Crockford-approved set of practices, check out Douglas Crockford's video series. Also, the Airbnb JS Style Guide has some pretty nifty tips for typists of all kinds.
Was this article helpful?