Should I use JSLint or JSHint JavaScript validation?
⚡TLDR
Use **JSLint** for a firm coding standard and minimal config, suitable for beginners or those following Crockford's conventions. Opt for **JSHint** for a more tailor-made linting experience, useful when you need bespoke project rules.
- **JSLint**: Rigorous, inflexible, ready-to-use.
- **JSHint**: Customizable, adaptable to diverse coding styles.
```js
// JSLint usage (no config, just get it rolling. No brakes on this train! Choo choo!):
JSLINT('var a = 1;');
JSLINT.errors; // Accesses errors, like peeling an onion of sadness.
// JSHint usage (with config. Feel like a barista - so many choices!):
/* jshint esversion: 6 */
JSHint('let a = 1;');
JSHint.errors; // Accesses errors, kind of like opening Pandora's box. Careful now.
Both instruments aim at cleaner code but prioritize different aspects. Pick based on your project's intricacy and team's philosophy.
Delving Deeper: Understanding Each Tool
Settling the Great Standards Debate: JSLint vs. JSHint
- JSLint is the embodiment of rigidity. Its strict rules set the bar high, serving as a definitive code coach. Follow JSLint when you appreciate Crockford's view points.
- Conversely, JSHint embraces the colors of coding practices. It is a custom-built linting partner that shapes rules to mirror your unique style.
The Balancing Act: Code Style vs. Bug Detection
- JSHint, while lenient in style, delivers a hard punch on bugs. It is a tough safeguard against common errors, minus the uncompromising nature of other tools.
- JSLint has faced heat for its rigid whitespace and format rules, but its rigor makes for highly dependable code.
Evolution by Community: JSHint's Power
- A feature of JSHint is its adaptability, driven by the JavaScript community, keeping it updated with contemporary best practices.
Introducing the Middle Ground: ESLint
- Enter ESLint, with its AST-based scanning allowing for custom rule-building. ESLint is a melting pot combining power and flexibility, catering to team needs with plugins for popular frameworks.
Digging Deeper: Adapting Tool Index to Code
Beyond Linting Tools: ESLint Plugins and Building Bridges
- ESLint's extendability makes room for community plugins. These can smoothly integrate with build tools like Webpack, Rollup or Parcel. Use
/* eslint-disable */comments for situational exceptions, but sparingly!
The Game Changer: Rethinking Typing Strategies in JavaScript
- For a more stable JavaScript ecosystem, consider TypeScript for static type checking. Flow is another sturdy type checker. For those looking beyond, Elm and Purescript are functional languages offering robust type safety systems.
Looking Back: Unearthing Classic Coding Principles
- Sometimes, inspiration lies in history. Classic languages like LISP can offer insightful strategies for writing clean, maintainable JavaScript.
Team Preferences: The Human Side of Tool Selection
- The divide between JSLint and JSHint isn't purely technical—team preferences and their coding experiences hold significant weight. A harmonious coding practice often trumps individual tool features.
Relevance to Codebase: The Practical Aspect
- Code maturity matters. Legacy projects and certain JavaScript libraries may clash with JSLint's rigid standards but easily fit within JSHint's broader approach. This practicality can sway your choice.
Linked
Was this article helpful?