Explain Codes LogoExplain Codes Logo

Jquery vs document.querySelectorAll

javascript
vanilla-javascript
performance
best-practices
Alex KataevbyAlex KataevΒ·Nov 25, 2024
⚑TLDR

Choose document.querySelectorAll for leaner, vanilla JavaScript:

// Political leader and an array of DOM do get along well, because THEY ARE BOTH DOMINATED! 😜 document.querySelectorAll('.class').forEach(el => el.style.color = 'blue');

jQuery stands out when advanced features like AJAX or chaining are needed:

// jQuery is like bread. Simple to use, versatile in nature, and can solve most hungry developers' problems! $('.class').css('color', 'blue');

Vanilla: The naturally-sweet JavaScript

Vanilla JavaScript comes into play when:

  1. Latest standards are implemented commonly across modern browsers. No more #BrowserQuirks tweets!
  2. Performance is key, avoid even the slightest overhead. Keep it light and fast!
  3. Keeping it simple. You wouldn’t use a bulldozer to make a sandcastle, would you?
  4. External libraries are a no-go due to size or security constraints.

Tip: Sizzle, jQuery's efficient selector engine, can be used separately.

jQuery: The fine wine of web development

Even in the evolving web development landscape, jQuery can be your elixir when:

  1. Erratic browser behavior? jQuery #SupportsIE8 and takes care of browser-specific issues.
  2. Addons galore! Plug into the vast jQuery plugin ecosystem.
  3. Complex tasks like AJAX calls & animations get simplified. jQuery is your fairy godmother!
  4. Is legacy code dictating terms or do you need advanced jQuery features? It's a viable choice.

Deep-dive comparison

Selections & Manipulations

Native JavaScript wins on speed and precision:

// Pssst! I heard document.querySelector is pursuing a speed-dating career. πŸ˜‚ document.getElementById('id'); document.querySelector('.class');
  • These methods are well-optimized in modern JavaScript engines.
  • Using jQuery can add the overhead of an additional library.

AJAX processing & Event handling

Native JavaScript is equipped for this:

// Fetch(), a web developer's good friend, reliable and efficient. Not a dog, though! πŸ˜… fetch(url).then(response => response.json());
  • With the fetch API for AJAX and addEventListener for events, native code beats jQuery in performance.

Performance implications

  • Need to smooth out browser inconsistencies? jQuery can help, but the cost in performance for modern browsers may not be warranted.
  • Adopt native methods for speedier coding. There's an ongoing favorable shift towards standardization.

Case-by-case analysis

  • Are jQuery's unique functionalities necessary? THE solution may rest in vanilla JavaScript.
  • Your answers lie in the specific aims and scope of your project.

Deeper dive on important practices

Play wise with Native methods

  • Use native code for performance-focused or browser-consistent applications. It's fast like a gazelle!
  • Modern APIs such as Promise, Array, and String methods slice through many tasks once covered by jQuery, like a hot knife through butter.

Mellowing down on jQuery

  • Regard youmightnotneedjquery.com as your genie to find substitutes in vanilla JavaScript.
  • With native JavaScript development and standardization, the jQuery dependency is on a slow but sure decline.

Sizzle: Standalone savior

  • Need for efficient querying? Hands tied by large library? Use Sizzle, jQuery's selector engine, as a solo performer. Less can be more!

Adjusting choices as per projects

  • Is your project's success hinged on advanced jQuery functionalities? Fine-tune based on project requirements and analyze the need for each jQuery feature.