Iterating through a Collection, Avoiding ConcurrentModificationException When Removing Objects in a Loop
Best practice to avoid ConcurrentModificationException
during iteration is to utilize an Iterator's remove()
built-in method. This secure operation permits an element deletion from the collection without any exception.
Core problem: Concurrent modifications
The crux of this problem lies in modifying a collection while iterating over it. Deftly named, ConcurrentModificationException
gets triggered when Java notices such interference during iteration.
Enter stage: The Iterator's remove() method
The Iterator interface pacifies this predicament with its remove()
method. This safeguard maintains a consistent internal count (expectedModCount
), making alterations in the collection ConcurrentModificationException-proof.
Choosing removal tools wisely
Venturing to modify a collection during iteration? Forget about the enhanced for-loop or the stream API. Instead, reach for:
- Iterator's
remove()
: for hands-on control - Collection's
removeIf(Predicate)
: for a streamlined condition-based removal
Using removeIf
not only promises safety from exceptions but also ensures clear and readable code with its single-line filtering capability.
Clever removal using Predicates
With an expansive array of tools, Java doesn’t fall short of efficient solutions. The Collection.removeIf(Predicate)
leads to a much cleaner and safe approach for removal operations. This modern method deters any risk of ConcurrentModificationException
.
Extra Care: Maps
Venturing outside the collections and into the world of Map
? Keep those same guard rails up. Maps don’t support the removeIf
method directly, but Iterator can still have your back.
Also, one can exploit Map.forEach
alongside entrySet().removeIf
for a cleaner deletion operation in a map.
Was this article helpful?