Why is Java's Iterator not an Iterable?
Iterable
is an interface providing multiple, independent iterators over a data source, while an Iterator
encapsulates just one traversal through the data. To make an Iterator
compatible with a for-each
loop, you can wrap it in an Iterable
:
Now, let's dissect the Iterator vs. Iterable dichotomy to understand the logic behind this.
Independent states and Iterator's one-way street
An Iterator
is stateful - it carries its state, e.g., where it currently points in a collection. This independence between Iterator
instances is vital for multithreaded environments. A Iterable
, on the other hand, provides a well-defined contract to yield a fresh Iterator
for each call to iterator()
. This ensures that multiple threads can concurrently traverse a collection without tripping over each other – like runners on their lanes in a race track.
Breaking the Iterator-Iterable impasse
If Iterator
were to extend Iterable
, it would inherently be tied to its iterator()
method. This could severely compromise its independence leading to bizarre and unwanted outcomes. To allow an Iterator
in a for-each
loop, we tactically adapt it to an Iterable
.
Java 8: A big leap for Iterator kind
The Iterator
interface got an upgrade with Java 8 in the form of the forEachRemaining()
method. This allows the usage of lambda expressions for remaining elements, providing a form of internal iteration that could potentially deliver better performance for collections that can optimize the traversal.
Best Practices: Navigating the Iterator-Iterable maze
Wrapping an Iterator
in an Iterable
should be a last-resort strategy, applicable in scenarios dealing with legacy APIs and unusual cases where only an Iterator
is available. Modern Java versions, (thank heavens!) afford versatile alternatives - from the elegant stream API to the enhanced for
loop to the forEachRemaining()
method. These are, indeed, interesting times to be a Java iterator.
Was this article helpful?