Const in JavaScript: when to use it and is it necessary?
Always prefer const
over let
while declaring variables. It immensely improves code predictability and maintainability. A const
locking variable assignment doesn't mean it freezes objects or arrays. Contrarily, it guards the binding not the value.
Switch over to let
only in scenarios where variable reassignment is inevitable. Otherwise, const
should be your default choice.
When to wear the const
hat
To inject predictability and avoid accidental reassignments, developers prefer const
while declaring immutable variables or values not meant to be re-bound. Here's where it comes handy:
- Declaring universal constants (ex: PI, SPEED_OF_LIGHT)
- Indicating immutable imports in modules
- Emphasizing immutable-by-default coding approach
Scope and initialization of const
Unlike var
which has functional or global scope, const
and let
enjoy block scope, limiting their reach to the block, statement or expression where they're declared.
An unassigned const
declaration is a no-go and results in a syntax error.
const
rules to code by
const
is like a contract. Once a const
variable is assigned a value, it's 'untouchable', ensuring code safety.
- Using
const
while declaring functions avoids reassignments resulting in unexpected behavior:
- Group related constants as enumerations, improving readability:
Performance gains using const
JavaScript engines are good at their job, they perform optimizations like dead code elimination when const
is used. Although performance benefits are minimal given current engine optimizations, const
actually helps improve runtime efficiency.
The objects are mutable Tightrope
Despite what the name implies, const
doesn't make assigned values immutable. Reassigning a const
value is forbidden, but objects and arrays can be mutated:
Was this article helpful?