Const in JavaScript: when to use it and is it necessary?
Always prefer const over let while declaring variables. It immensely improves code predictability and maintainability. A const locking variable assignment doesn't mean it freezes objects or arrays. Contrarily, it guards the binding not the value.
Switch over to let only in scenarios where variable reassignment is inevitable. Otherwise, const should be your default choice.
When to wear the const hat
To inject predictability and avoid accidental reassignments, developers prefer const while declaring immutable variables or values not meant to be re-bound. Here's where it comes handy:
- Declaring universal constants (ex: PI, SPEED_OF_LIGHT)
- Indicating immutable imports in modules
- Emphasizing immutable-by-default coding approach
Scope and initialization of const
Unlike var which has functional or global scope, const and let enjoy block scope, limiting their reach to the block, statement or expression where they're declared.
An unassigned const declaration is a no-go and results in a syntax error.
const rules to code by
const is like a contract. Once a const variable is assigned a value, it's 'untouchable', ensuring code safety.
- Using
constwhile declaring functions avoids reassignments resulting in unexpected behavior:
- Group related constants as enumerations, improving readability:
Performance gains using const
JavaScript engines are good at their job, they perform optimizations like dead code elimination when const is used. Although performance benefits are minimal given current engine optimizations, const actually helps improve runtime efficiency.
The objects are mutable Tightrope
Despite what the name implies, const doesn't make assigned values immutable. Reassigning a const value is forbidden, but objects and arrays can be mutated:
Was this article helpful?