vs.
. Which to use?
Select <button>
when you want to embed rich HTML elements; a versatile choice for contemporary web applications. Pick <input type="button">
for a straightforward, text-only button. <button>
is preferred by modern developers due to its broader capabilities.
<button>
:
<input>
:
When to use which: Context Matters
Your choice between <input type="button">
and <button>
should depend on the task at hand. <input type="button">
ensures consistency across older browsers, while <button>
lets you jazz up your interfaces with enriched content. Let's weigh their pros and cons in different scenarios.
In a nutshell: Forms, functions, and more
Disarm the form bomb
Inside a form, a <button>
with no explicit type
appears to be innocuous but defaults to type="submit"
. Always use type="button"
with <button>
to avoid accidentally submitting forms.
The magic button
Thanks to JavaScript, <button>
can be used like a magic wand to customize behavior. They work well for interactive UI components such as dropdowns, modals, and tabs.
Accessibility truth bomb
Both <button>
and <input type="button">
are accessible. But <button>
's content flexibility allows more expressive UIs for screen readers, giving us another point to Team <button>
.
Here be dragons: Cross-browser compatibility
When you're targeting older versions of Internet Explorer (we all make bad choices sometimes), choosing <input>
can save you a few gray hairs; it renders consistently across all browsers.
All about aesthetics: Practical usage and style
Ornamental uniformity
Achieving consistent styling is a breeze with <button>
due to its behavior as a block-level element. <input>
buttons might give you a bit of sass with their stubborn default styles across browsers.
In living color
<button>
's support for HTML tags means it's a dream to work with for dynamic text presentation. A little bow for <strong>
, <em>
, or <span>
tags is all part of the show.
Was this article helpful?