Explain Codes LogoExplain Codes Logo

Using Node.js require vs. ES6 import/export

javascript
import-export
module-system
performance-optimization
Alex KataevbyAlex Kataev·Sep 12, 2024
TLDR

Opt for ES6 import/export when working with the most recent JavaScript developments:

import moduleName from 'module-name'; // Not stealing, just borrowing 🚲
  • ES6 Modules are standardized and allow tree-shaking, trimming the fat for neat and efficient code.

For Node.js specific tasks, employ CommonJS require():

const module = require('module-name'); // Needed it so I required it
  • CommonJS fits for dynamic requires within the Node.js runtime.

Key takeaway:

  • CommonJS is synchronized—a dance specifically choreographed for Node.js.
  • ES6 Modules, however, let you ballroom dance with the future—its static, definable structure aids in optimization.

As of Node v13.2.0, ES6 modules find a place; set "type": "module" in package.json or .mjs file extensions to make this clear.

Compatibility and Legacy Code

Cohabitation with Node.js and ES6

Node.js and ES6 modules only recently resolved their differences. Node 12 onwards, ES6 modules can strut their stuff by using .mjs extension or "type": "module" in the package.json. That said, the massive and mature ecosystem of Node still uses the CommonJS format.

  • Bridging the old and new: Transitioning to ES6 might mean renovating legacy code realms.
  • Getting along with the past: Tools like Babel ensure peace in the family by converting import/export to CommonJS on the down-low.
  • Preparing for the future: ES6 lets engines excel with auto-optimization and tree-shaking magic when your code goes frontend.

Dynamic Imports and Code-splitting

Dynamic code splitting with import() is the secret sauce of ES6 that counteracts the sluggishness of synchronous module loading—it's the racing stripes on your sports car.

  • Import prowess: Import only what you need, and the system efficiency skyrockets, with memory housekeeping moving faster.
  • While CommonJS takes comfort in conditionally loading modules, ES6's dynamic import is a modern marvel.

Adaptability and Future-Compatibility

The ES6 module syntax is adopted across the JavaScript ecosystem, granting them friendship bracelets with tools like Webpack and Rollup—tools that polish bundling.

  • Bye, bye UMD: ES6 modules reduce the UMD reliance. This reduces the divide between CommonJS and AMD patterns.
  • Everywhere and anywhere: ES6 modules work equally well, server-side or client-side.
  • Get future-ready: Your codebases will still hold their own as JavaScript progresses when using ES6 modules.

Perfomance and Real-time Optimization

Performance Boosts with ES6

The static structure of ES6 modules lets under-the-hood optimization happen better than in an episode of 'Pimp My Ride'. The result? Goosebump-inducing performance hikes in the right scenarios.

  • Tree shaking: No, not for apples, but eliminating dead code has never been easier with ES6 modules and their still-life structure.
  • Ensure smaller bundle size and faster load times with modern JavaScript bundlers springing into action on ES6 code.

Going Async with ES6

Nothing stands in the way of progress with asynchronous loading in ES6. Large modules aren't elephants in the room anymore, leading to non-blocking code execution and graffiti of improved application experience on the wall.

  • Async wonders: Fall in sync with Node.js's philosophy of non-blocking operations.
  • See optimized memory usage when dynamically loading modules needed at runtime – an ES6 exclusive.

Benchmarking and Future-proofing

While the performance benefits of ES6 modules might play hide and seek, they are the silent supporters of a receptive and scalable codebase.

  • Get the real-world performance under scrutiny: Benchmark your application to see the actual benefits.
  • Evaluate your project's needs: Every developer should measure the potential impacts and pick their module system gear.

Seamless Collaboration for Dev Teams

With JavaScript courses running through several environments, having a unified module system makes collaboration easier than finishing each other's sentences.

  • Full-stack developers can switch contexts without a headache with consistent syntax across the stack.
  • Having multiple developers on a project? Shared knowledge and less cognitive load when using ES6 modules make it a cakewalk.