.trim() in JavaScript not working in IE

Understanding and implementing compatibility checks

If you find yourself in the IE8 neighborhood, .trim() isn't a familiar face there. Why not create our own .trim()? Using the above polyfill, we first check if .trim() exists. If it doesn't, we add the functionality to String.prototype, bamboozling IE8 into recognizing .trim()!

Note: If you're using jQuery before version 3.5, try $.trim() function for cross-browser compatibility:

// "Who you gonna call? jQuery Trimmers!"
console.log($.trim("   Spooked spaces   ")); // "Spooked spaces"


Now, before rushing to use these methods, always knock on the door to see if they're home:

// .trim() might be on a vacation, who knows? So, better to check before you ship.
if (typeof(String.prototype.trim) === "undefined") {
  // Time for a home remedy if .trim() is missing
}


Meet defensive programming, where your code is prepared to tango with unpredictable scenarios.

Diving deep into the trimming process

Unmasking .trim(), all it does is use the .replace() method to sweep leading and trailing whitespace characters under the rug:

// We're going on a whitespace hunt. Shhh... be very quiet.
var trimmedString = originalString.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g, '');


The regular expression /^\s+|\s+$/g is the FBI agent here, stalking spaces at the start ^\s+ and at the end \s+$ of a string. The g flag ensures all matches aren't left unnoticed.

Weighing up compatibility solutions

Now, armed with the quick fix and jQuery, here's some food for thought:

• Target practice: Aim to know your audience and their browsers, and whether they require these polyfills.
• Think Library : If you're already using libraries like lodash or underscore, they've got your back with the _.trim() function, providing cross-browser consistency.
• Polyfills Central: To guarantee the entire carnival of legacy support, consider parking es5-shim in your project, offering a smorgasbord of ES5 polyfills.

Crafting a gracefully degrading experience

Priority number one: deliver an uninterrupted user experience, regardless of their browser choice. Here are some pearls of wisdom:

• Graceful fallback: Build features that stay functional, even if the snazzy parts aren't supported.
• Feature detection: In evolving browser landscapes, prefer feature detection, a far more reliable and future-proof strategy than browser sniffing.
• Polyfills and transpilers: Tools like Babel can transform your state-of-the-art JavaScript into a more digestible version for older browsers, with polyfills filling in the compatibility gaps.

Striking the balance between compatibility and performance

With power (read polyfills), comes responsibility. Weigh the benefits of compatibility against the potential performance overhead:

• Conditional loading: Ship polyfills only when necessary, perhaps by scoping browser capabilities.
• Performance testing: Use tools like JSPerf to gauge the performance footprint of your polyfill.
• Stay updated: As JavaScript engines evolve, so do the best practices. Keep in touch with yours to stay in sync with their performance gains.