Retrieving the output of subprocess.call()
To capture the output of a command, utilize the subprocess.run()
function with capture_output=True
as shown below:
This Python snippet returns the command's output in output
and any pickled errors in error
.
Going deeper: understand and explore alternatives
The right function for the mission
Different missions require different tools. While subprocess.run()
is your Swiss Army knife, some tasks might require the surgical precision of subprocess.Popen()
with stdout=subprocess.PIPE
. Pick your weapon of choice according to the complexity of the task and your Python version constraints.
Sniff out errors like a bloodhound
Errors are like rats. You don't want them, but you can't ignore them. By passing both stderr=subprocess.PIPE
and stdout
, Python turns into a bloodhound, sniffing out errors as well as output.
Code notation: More universal than Esperanto
Different systems, different dialects. That's why we have shlex.split()
for tokenizing command strings, giving us a syntax more universal than Esperanto, and enhancing compatibility across platforms.
Decoding Hogwarts letters
Sometimes, the output is like a Hogwarts letter while your app only understands Muggle English. By choosing text=True
your output is decoded into a human-friendly string format. If not, you'll have a bunch of cryptic bytes to decode.
Take a hint from Indiana Jones
Remember to use the correct tools! subprocess.call()
works like an archaeologist cataloguing artifact (exit status), while run()
and check_output()
are the scribes, capturing every detail of the output.
Hacks, tips, and things that make you go "Hmm...”
Ready for all scenarios
Mistakes happen, but Python can take it on the chin. It's always ready with CalledProcessError
. A solid defence against potential errors entails good error handling.
Debunking misunderstandings
A common pitfall is trying to use StringIO
with subprocess.call()
for output capture. But this is like fitting a round peg in a square hole and ends up serving no purpose.
Quick hands, clean job
Avoid cluttering up your code with temporary output files. Instead, opt for the swift and clean approach using pipes with Popen()
and communicate()
.
Python evolution
Beware that subprocess.run()
is a Python 3.5+ luxury. For earlier versions, fall back on the robust but verbose Popen()
or the succinct and reliable submariner check_output()
.
Was this article helpful?