Is it good practice to use the xor operator for boolean checks?

best-practices

boolean-checks

code-readability

code-maintainability

byAnton Shumikhin·Feb 24, 2025

Choose simplicity and readability over complexity: use && and || instead of ^ (xor) for boolean checks. Xor can seem cryptic, potentially obscuring your code's intentions. Here's a comparison:

// The following code has a licence to confuse.
boolean isExclusive = a ^ b;

// This code, however, likes its Booleans shaken, not stirred.
boolean isExclusive = (a || b) && !(a && b);

Enhance both understandability and maintainability with self-explanatory, properly named methods:

// The name's Or. Exclusive Or.
boolean isExclusive = isExclusiveOr(a, b);

private static boolean isExclusiveOr(boolean x, boolean y) {
    return (x || y) && !(x && y);
}

This way, your code stays to the point, readable and maintainability doesn't become a nightmare.

Clarity over complexity: Why it matters

In terms of boolean checks, it's always best to keep code clean and simple. Here's why:

Readability: != is universally known, and doesn't require second thoughts like ^ might.
Maintainability: Using tough constructs can confuse future code maintainers. Adhering to clear constructs reduces this risk.
Consistency: Using != keeps the language flow fluid, leading to more uniform and easy-to-follow code.
Collaboration: Remember, code is often read by others, so make it as interpretable and useful as possible.

Hence, opt for simpler language constructs unless a cryptic operator like xor really adds value.

Nailing the right operator: Situations to keep in mind

While working with boolean checks, choosing the right operand can be a real game-changer. Here are some typical scenarios:

Debugging: Using != or logical operators instead of xor makes step-by-step debugging smoother than a jazz saxophone solo.
Team Ethics: Some teams love to follow their predefined practices. Sticking to the team's standards ensures flawless code collaborations.
Performance: If performance is crucial, and if xor becomes a bottleneck (or you like to live life on the edge), then you may reconsider its usage.

Traps and how to avoid falling into them

The xor operator can often trick you into subtle bugs and misunderstanding. Be wary of:

Implicit casting: Mixing types can lead to unexpected results, subtle as a cat on a skateboard.
Readability: Especially for young Jedi coders, xor may seem as cryptic as translating Yoda's speech.
Optimization: Java compilers are smarter than a thousand foxes and will optimize well-known constructs pretty well.

Beyond the xor operator: Enhancing your Code

Even while avoiding xor for boolean checks, there's plenty you can do to sharpen your code:

Descriptive naming: Your variable and method names should reflect their purpose.
Logical decomposition: Break complex problems into simpler, more manageable chunks, coded as boolean methods.
Testing: Write unit tests for your Boolean logic to ensure correctness and communicate what the code does (bonus: good for your mental health).

As always, remember that code isn't just meant to work correctly - it should also tell a compelling story to whoever reads it.

explain-codes / Best practices / Is it good practice to use the xor operator for boolean checks?

Linked

Cleanest way to toggle a boolean variable in Java?



How do you get the logical xor of two variables in Python?



What does the exclamation mark do before the function?



Why is there no logical XOR?



What is the Java ?: operator called and what does it do?