How to initialize List<String>
object in Java?
For a mutable List<String>
, initialize this way:
Need a prefilled list? Here:
If you need an immutable list, create it as such:
Selection guide: Choose your List implementation wisely!
Mutable lists can be changed anytime. Immutable lists remain the same post creation.
Here are some common List<String>
implementations suited to various needs:
- ArrayList: Excellent for frequent get operations.
- LinkedList: Designed for heavy insertion or deletion.
- Vector: An
ArrayList
with a degree in thread synchronization.
Kickstart your List with values
- Use
Arrays.asList
for a fixed-size list pre-filled with elements. Adding or removing elements however ends in tears andUnsupportedOperationException
. - Make your fixed-size list dynamic with some magic:
new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(...));
. Now, no one cries when you add or remove elements. - For greater flexibility, harness the power of the
Stream
API in JDK 8 and beyond: - With JDK 9, you've got the power to create an immutable list with
List.of()
. To make it mutable later, use this clever cheat code:
Know your List type: Performance specifics
- ArrayList: Fast read operations, less stellar for random insertions/deletions.
- LinkedList: Swift insertions/deletions, slower get operations.
- Vector: Doesn't break into a sweat under multithreaded operations but can take a few extra milliseconds to deliver.
Initializing Lists: Next level stuff
Dynamic initialization with Java 8 Stream
API
With the Stream
API, you've got an array of options for complex initializations:
List initialization using third-party libraries
Fancy something different? Libraries like Guava offer unique patterns for list initialization.
Don't fall for the banana in the tailpipe
Don't turn red with embarrassment! Remember, you can't instantiate a List
interface directly (it's an interface, not a class). And don't mistake the list created with Arrays.asList()
for a regular ArrayList
!
Matter of performance: Choose suitably
When initializing lists, performance matters a lot. Consider these factors:
- ArrayList offers low memory overhead but may be slowed down by heavy insertions/deletions.
- LinkedList is perfect for frequent modifications, at the cost of more memory used.
- Vector is safe for multithreaded environments, but the additional thread safety can slightly slow down operations.
- Capacity matters too. ArrayList starts with a default capacity but grows on demand; Vector allows setting an initial capacity and increment capacity.
Was this article helpful?