Why do Java programmers like to name a variable "clazz"?
In Java, clazz
circumvents the reserved keyword class
, enabling undisrupted reference to a Class
object. This is a defensive programming technique that dodges errors and ensures code clarity.
Example:
The above snippet uses clazz
as a surrogate for class
to access and print the class name of an object, emphasizing clazz
's practicality and seamless integration into Java code.
Behind the scenes: History of "clazz"
The naming convention of clazz
is a historic practice stretching back to Java Development Kit (JDK) 1.0. Successive generations of Java source code and tutorials stamped clazz
into Java's coding culture. Its widespread use isn't due to inherent benefits but is a legacy of convention.
From an etymological perspective
The usage of "clazz" may seem intuitive to non-native English speakers due to the familiar 's' to 'z' transition prevalent in International English. This interchangeable usage may have contributed to clazz
's popularity.
Readability is king
While "Class type" provides a clear definition, the shorter clazz
tends to be preferred for its brevity and unambiguous representation of a Class
object.
Embracing the java tradition
Origins of "clazz” in JDK
Looking back to JDK 1.0, the clazz
convention was already present in its source code. This historical usage set the foundation for future Java programmers to embrace clazz
as a common practice.
Unifying code with "clazz”
Implementing clazz
is key to maintaining consistency across Java codebases, as it helps increase code readability and understandability.
Alternatives to "clazz"
Notwithstanding, clazz
isn't the only option. cls
is also used for denoting class references, though clazz
remains the community favorite.
Synthesis and implications
Practicality leads the way
Utilizing clazz
is more about convenience than choice. It avers syntactic mishaps and creates a distinct identifier for a Class object.
Traditional vs contemporary usage
While adhering to conventions like clazz
may seem old-fashioned, it greatly enhances code readability and comprehensibility. However, it's also worth exploring newer conventions that could shape Java's future.
Room for innovation
Should new conventions gain traction, clazz
may not always be the go-to choice. Nonetheless, it currently serves its purpose flawlessly, proving that clazz
is indeed in a class of its own.
Was this article helpful?