What is the use of join() in threading?

java

threading

concurrency

deadlocks

byAlex Kataev·Mar 12, 2025

The join() function in Python's threading module is a synchronizer. It makes the calling thread, usually the main thread, wait until the thread its called upon, the child thread, is finished. It becomes a cornerstone in your code to prevent unwanted surprises such as race conditions or premature thread completion. Here's an example:

import threading

def task():
    print("Starting task…")  # Task, engage!

# We kick off the thread
t = threading.Thread(target=task)
t.start()
t.join()  # Hold your horses, main! Let 't' finish.

print("Task completed")  # Only printed after 't' has done its stuff.

Relying on join() ensures that "Task completed" only prints after the thread 't' has gracefully completed its task.

join() in thread synchronization and management

join() is key for managing and controlling the execution flow of your program, particularly in cases where there are data dependencies between the main thread and its child threads. Here's why it's more important than it might seem at first glance:

Threads and concurrent tasks

In a scenario where you have multiple threads pulling in data concurrently, say in the case of concurrent data downloads, you'd want to ensure that all parts are downloaded before they get compiled. join(), here, ensures all threads have completed downloading their respective parts — avoiding any half-baked results.

Daemon threads and join()

Daemon threads are designed to run in the background and exit when your main program ends. While you can let them run without explicitly joining them, using join() gives you more control over their lifecycle, ensuring a clean shutdown and that any cleanup tasks have been taken care of.

Apply a timeout for flexibility

Slapping on a timeout, using join(timeout), can limit the waiting time for the calling thread, adding a layer of adaptability to your program.

Best practices for using join()

Deadlocks: The threading nightmares

join() sounds all cool until you're stuck in a deadlock: two threads waiting for each other to finish using join(), causing a standstill. Careful design of your threading model is key to avoid this deadlock dance.

Building responsive, inter-thread events

In use-cases where threads need to respond to events from other threads, using condition objects or queues can give you more control on coordination and signaling.

No zombies allowed!

It's also important to keep tabs on the lifetime of threads, particularly when you're making lots of them. join() ensures your threads aren't aimlessly running around like zombie processes, hogging system resources for no good reason.

Practical applications and caveats

join() isn't your silver bullet for all threading scenarios. Here are a few considerations to keep in mind when deciding its usage:

When to use join()

When you're dealing with inter-thread dependencies, like in web scraping or parallel computations, where the final result is assembled from each thread's individual results, join() becomes indispensable.

Alternatives to join()

In scenarios where join() might not fit the bill, look at alternatives like Event objects or Queue for inter-thread communication. Each provides a unique strength for your threading toolbox.

Handling exceptions

Remember that exceptions within a thread could prevent join() from ever completing. Wrap thread logic in try/except blocks to catch those pesky bugs and ensure join() is allowed to finish its job.

explain-codes / Java / What is the use of join() in threading?

Linked

Completablefuture<t> class: join() vs get()



What does this thread join code mean?



What's the difference between Thread start() and Runnable run()



Should I always use a parallel stream when possible?



Java synchronized method lock on object, or method?

