What is the difference between str and repr?
__str__
forges a formatted string for end-users, while __repr__
concocts an explicit string encapsulating an object's essence for developers. Preferably, __repr__
should enable eval(repr(obj))
to reconstruct the object.
Example:
Calling str(item)
, you get a readable summary, repr(item)
gives you a meticulous representation including object type and quotes around strings for precise reconstruction.
str vs repr: When to use which?
For everyday usage, __str__
serves up a user-oriented version of an object. It might format the data into a human-legible form or pare down information to only highlight the essentials.
Conversely, __repr__
is invaluable for debugging or logging, as it dishes out an intense and precise representation. Ideally, __repr__
can be used to recreate the object.
Dealing with container types
Did you know that containers like lists and dictionaries use __repr__
of their elements when rendered as strings? Therefore, you should always make your __repr__
string-friendly.
Logging? __repr__
got your back!
A detailed __repr__
is extremely helpful during logging. If reconstruction is not possible (like when you depend on external resources), making __repr__
informative is a must.
__str__
is MIA! Now what?
If __str__
is absent, Python will default to __repr__
. The reverse is not true, underlining that creating a robust __repr__
is more important than __str__
.
Guidelines for implementing str and repr
Squint, clarity ahead!
A transparent __repr__
is crucial. Use placeholders and type indications to ensure clarity:
Abridging with __str__
- a good read
With __str__
, you can distil the information by focusing on what's most relevant:
repr() and str() in code... The Avengers, assemble!
Invoke repr()
for unambiguous representation and str()
for a user-friendly portrayal, keeping your objects in character in any context.
Constructing with __repr__
When feasible, it's best to structure __repr__
to be eval
-able, to recreate the object:
However, if that's not feasible, focus on creating a useful diagnostic output.
Reworking default behaviors: To Change or Not to Change?
Setting up a clear __repr__
By redefining __repr__
, we invite transparency and clarity. Even a class without much state should have a __repr__
to stand out from its instances:
__str__
and __repr__
twinning
Synchronize __str__
with __repr__
to maintain consistency in both development and user-facing contexts. It's like having a smoothie with an identical nutritional supplement.
Tailoring __str__
for containers
Boost the __str__
presentation of containers with .join()
and custom element presentations. It's like turning your simple list into an exotic fruit salad - more interesting and appealing:
Was this article helpful?