T-sql Conditional Order By
For dynamically changing sorting criteria, use a CASE
statement in the ORDER BY
. For instance, sorting a People
table by LastName
or BirthDate
based on 'retired' status is as follows:
Here, retired individuals (IsRetired = 1
) will be sorted by BirthDate
, while non-retired individuals by LastName
. This approach specifically tailors the sort order according to row-specific data.
Deploying dynamic SQL for conditional ordering
In scenarios where conditional ordering gets complicated, dynamic SQL might be your go-to. This tactic conditionally crafts the ORDER BY
clause based on requisite needs:
Dynamic SQL lets you modify the sorting column runtime, adding an element of flexibility. Be cautious, and always sanitize and validate user inputs to prevent SQL injection attacks.
Making the choice: CASE over dynamic SQL?
- Simplicity: Stick to
CASE
for column-specific, straightforward conditions. - Performance: Complex or multi-column sorting? Dynamic SQL often crafts better query plans.
- Safety: Validated inputs against SQL injection are mandatory for any dynamic SQL.
Knowing your CASE - Compatibility and restrictions
- Data Types:
CASE
outputs must be friendly with compatible data types. - Collation: Stay alert of implicit collation conversions causing errors or unintended performance pitfalls.
- Sort Direction: Mixing
ASC
andDESC
within a singleCASE
statement isn't supported natively.
Conditional Order By Approaches
Conditional sorting with multiple CASE statements
For dealing with multiple columns, multiple CASE statements can weave magic albeit with added complexity:
The might of dynamic SQL
For multidimensional sorting where columns and directions aren't constants, dynamic SQL is the superhero. Though with great power comes great responsibility – Always validate inputs or use parameterized queries to avoid security loopholes.
Tackling CASE hurdles
- Predefine types: Avoid casting overheads; Ensure
CASE
operates on matching types. - Handy with NULLs: Remember,
CASE
treatsNULL
as the lowest possible value when sorting.
Was this article helpful?