Language SQL vs LANGUAGE plpgsql in PostgreSQL functions

sql

database-optimization

function-design

sql-performance

byAnton Shumikhin·Oct 30, 2024

Choose LANGUAGE SQL when your function covers a simple SQL query. It allows PostgreSQL to optimize execution as it would with any regular query. Opt for LANGUAGE plpgsql when your functions demand procedural logic, like loops or conditional statements that aren't covered by SQL.

LANGUAGE SQL:

Uncomplicated, single-operation queries
Auto-optimized

Example:

CREATE FUNCTION get_employee_names() RETURNS SETOF text AS $$
-- Fetching employee names, not their coffee preferences!
SELECT name FROM employees;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;

LANGUAGE plpgsql:

Advanced, multi-step procedures
Custom control flow

Example:

CREATE FUNCTION calculate_bonus(employee_id INT) RETURNS numeric AS $$
BEGIN
  -- No bonus for stealing office supplies, Carl!
  RETURN (SELECT COALESCE(SUM(amount), 0) FROM bonuses WHERE emp_id = employee_id);
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

Pick LANGUAGE SQL for straightforward tasks, LANGUAGE plpgsql for advanced operations.

Diving Deeper: Decoding the Differences

SQL Functions: Speed and Efficiency

LANGUAGE SQL functions are typically quicker and inlined, letting the PostgreSQL planner treat the function as an integral part of the query. This leads to efficient inlining and plan caching. SQL functions maintain an atomic nature, executing all-or-none, which is an asset for atomic operations.

PLpgSQL Functions: Complex Logic and Flexibility

On the other hand, LANGUAGE plpgsql works wonders with complex logic, variable declarations, and dynamic SQL execution. Code blocks determined by BEGIN ... END; let you have multiple SQL statements, handle errors efficiently, and use control structures such as loops and conditional execution.

Handling Errors and Managing Dynamic SQL

Error trapping, a must-have for managing execution failures, is exclusive to plpgsql. Dynamic SQL, which composes and executes SQL strings, is another plpgsql feature that lends flexibility and adaptability to your functions.

Transactions and Failures

Here's a nuanced but critical difference: plpgsql functions wrap the execution within a block. So, if an error happens, the changes within the function get rolled back, unless you catch the error—quite a lifesaver! In contrast, SQL functions operate within the calling query's transaction, a testament to their atomic nature.

Reusability, Extensibility, and Customization

Use plpgsql for reusable algorithmic processes where computations might get complex over time or if there's a need for DDL statements in your function. For less complex, lockstep operations, SQL functions are the way to go.

The Art of Creating Functions and Setting Boundaries

Though both function types use the CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION syntax, for plpgsql, function bodies are defined within $$ or $tag$** delimiters. Moreover, **plpgsql** houses a **DECLARE` section for variable definitions.

The Return Journey: Managing Output

Both languages demand explicit return types using the RETURNS keyword. In plpgsql, the RETURN statement exits the function and passes back a value, which can be a single value, a record, or a table—your function's RETURNS call decides that.

Caution Corner: Stumbling Blocks and Recommendations

Avoid Over-Engineering

Sometimes, simple SQL functions might get overengineered into plpgsql—an unnecessary complication. So, don't default to plpgsql for basic computations, as it adds unneeded overhead and complexity.

Performance and Optimization

Before settling on a function language, it's good practice to benchmark different implementations, especially when performance is crucial. While plpgsql functions may appear slower due to the additional overhead, their ability to cache plans for EXECUTE statements can outpace others for repetitive tasks.

Be Wary of Direct Translations

Exercise caution when directly translating SQL code into plpgsql, as few features might not carry over smoothly. Even if they do, translating complex queries may induce unexpected inefficiencies or behavior.

Iterations and Improvements

After creating functions, thoroughly test them to ensure they behave as expected. Be prepared to refactor as your database schema evolves or new requirements surface.

explain-codes / Sql / Language SQL vs LANGUAGE plpgsql in PostgreSQL functions

Linked

How to create a temporary function in PostgreSQL?



Why do people hate SQL cursors so much?



Postgresql syntax check without running the query



Update or Insert (multiple rows and columns) from subquery in PostgreSQL



Using tuples in SQL "IN" clause

