How to report an error from a SQL Server user-defined function
Aforementioned code snippet uses divide by zero as a beacon to signal an error within a function. SQL Server grimly forbids the direct use of RAISERROR
or THROW
in user-defined functions. However, this clever ploy circumvents that rule effectively, hops on a jet, takes off to the calling code, and crash lands as an error. For high-level error handling scenarios, stored procedures are your knights in shining armor.
Mastering custom error handling and avoiding confusion
The astute algorithm above unveils a well-planned scenario handling invalid input. Stalking the trail of an error message, the function returns an integer rather than a null. Covertly disguised in INT’s clothing, it confuses SQL Server into thinking it's just another regular integer datatype. Like a professional poker player, SQL Server continues the game, consequentially leading to a CAST error that unravels the ruse. Jason Bourne would be proud.
Throwback to SQL Server 2008 error handling saga
Let's turn back the dial for a bit and see how SQL Server 2008 handled errors. It was a time before Thrones were gamed and avengers assembled.
Here, a simple divide by zero error was used as the alarm bell for errors. Quite like the Unbreakable Vow from our beloved Potter universe, use it cautiously. In the following chapters, a cleaner and more subtle approach replaced this relic from the past. As always, be a good Samaritan and document all its use cases. Just like our history books, let's document our code for future generations to understand.
Table-Valued Function (TVF) and the art of error handling
In the realm of Table-Valued Functions (TVFs), the custom of explicit error messages isn't native. Fear not, we have a plan.
The TVFs return a result set with bonus attributes: ErrorFlag
and ErrorMessage
. A nonzero ErrorFlag
and a populated ErrorMessage
are like semaphores on a railway track, signaling an impending error.
Wise man says: validate inputs before errors become issues
In the UDF universe, invalid inputs can sometimes lead to chaos (and endless cups of coffee in some cases). Handle these inputs carefully to keep the generic errors away. Unconventional errors might just save the day by making debugging a lot easier.
Say no to 'Cryptic Mode': Make function behavior clear
Be the Good Samaritan: document the specific behaviors of your functions. This assists other developers to understand the expected behavior and why NULLs, the drama queens of SQL, are making appearances.
Endorse Developer Comfort: Assist in diagnosing NULL
Invest in developer experience (DX) and make friends with fellow coders. Offering a contextual error handle helps them understand potential pitfalls caused by NULL outcomes.
Consider alternate exit strategies apart from Divide by Zero
SELECT 1/0;
might be a clever ploy, but remember it's not the only trick in the bag. Alternate error handling methods include custom return values, conditional error messages, or even table-valued functions specifically coded to handle errors.
Was this article helpful?