How much disk-space is needed to store a NULL value using postgresql DB?
In PostgreSQL, a NULL
value itself consumes zero bytes of disk space in a column. This efficiency is achieved through PostgreSQL's bitmap vector to represent NULL values, where each bit corresponds to a nullable column in the table. Hence, multiple NULL
columns add up to just a few bytes (8 nullable columns fit within 1 byte). However, it's worth mentioning that table and column overhead can add to space usage, independently of the NULL values themselves.
The Internals of NULL
In PostgreSQL, the importance of inner workings is often underscored. When we talk about the storage of NULL
values, it's crucial mentioning the HeapTupleHeader
. This agent is responsible for holding metadata about rows and has a fixed size of 23 bytes, whether the row has NULL
values or not.
Correspondingly, the actual data storage of a row starts at a multiple of MAXALIGN
. Typically, MAXALIGN
is 8 on 64-bit systems - don't confuse this with the latest dance move!
In terms of NULL value storage, PostgreSQL is quite economical. For tables with up to 8 columns, no additional space contributions are needed for the null bitmap; it's snugly included in the HeapTupleHeader
. However, as you add nullable columns in multiples of 8, an extra MAXALIGN
bytes are allocated— not for the NULLs themselves, but to map them.
Are you still with us? Let's illustrate this with some SQL:
Even if info
, details
, and more_info
are all set to NULL
, the storage space remains consistent. That's PostgreSQL being frugal!
Delving into Anomalies
If you're thinking that a table with more nullable columns will be significantly larger because of those NULLs, think again! PostgreSQL, smart as it is, uses a minimalistic approach to manage the null bitmap alongside the usual row headers.
However, anomalies in associated behavior are more typically the result of database bloat (that's not a cool, new AI term) but factors such as dead tuples left over from previous data manipulation operations.
Data Realignment and Performance
Following the bookshelf metaphor, consider the alignment of books on the shelf. PostgreSQL, being performance-conscious, aligns its data at MAXALIGN
boundaries. This MAXALIGN
(alignment mask) is done for efficient CPU memory access. This data alignment, in essence, is independent of NULLs but critical for disk storage and also makes your database run like a gazelle!
Handling Wide Tables
As a database administrator, it's essential to understand how column number—not just data—affects the storage. When tables grow wider than 8 columns, PostgreSQL grabs more space for each set of 8 additional columns to manage the null bitmap.
Essentially, PostgreSQL turns into a space-conscious squirrel, hoarding additional space for null bitmaps in anticipation of more nullable column data. Bottom line mission: never underestimate the storage implications on large tables when you're in the designing phase.
Monitoring disk Space Consumption
Welcome to the last stop on this rollercoaster ride! Here's something you'll love - practical ways to monitor and maintain your precious database.
To understand the disk-space consumption, you can use the pg_column_size
function to measure both the apparent and actual size of rows, including the space taken by NULL
values. Remember, maintenance is key, babes!
Regular data grooming, like the VACUUM
operation, is the spit and polish needed to keep your database decluttered from dead tuples, ensuring efficient PostgreSQL functionality, and a happier you!
Was this article helpful?