Flexbox vs Twitter Bootstrap (or similar framework)
To choose between Flexbox and Bootstrap, the key factor is your project's requirements. Flexbox is perfect for dynamic, one-dimensional layouts, providing effortless vertical centering and spacing. On the flip side, Bootstrap brings a comprehensive toolkit that includes various components and responsive utilities, which extend beyond Flexbox's layout capabilities.
It might come down to strategy: Use Flexbox for a meticulous control over layout, or Bootstrap for handy pre-made components and scripts.
Flexbox: The power to simplify
Flexbox significantly simplifies layout designs without the need for positional hacks or floats. It shines especially in the "dynamic content" landscape, making it a go-to choice for app-like interfaces where content dimensions change unpredictably. The ease of managing an item's size and spacing is a Flexbox superpower.
The alignment game and vertical centering
One of the greatest feats Flexbox accomplishes is making vertical centering a cakewalk. Remember the ominously difficult times with traditional CSS? Also, Flexbox keeps columns equal in height, matching the largest child element — a boon for uniform styling.
Fluidity and browser-awareness
For layouts that demand fluidity and responsiveness, Flexbox's boxes can grow or shrink to fill the unused space or prevent overflow. Nifty order property to the rescue when content needs reordering, avoiding complexity of adjusting Bootstrap's .order-* classes. But remember, while Bootstrap's grid has a wider historical support, check Can I Use for current Flexbox support.
Bootstrap: A ready-made toolkit
Bootstrap brings a robust toolkit, including JavaScript plugins and predefined styles. It's a potential time-saver for rapid prototypes and favors consistency across projects. But note that it can be heavier to load than a CSS-only solution like Flexbox.
Speed and consistency
If you want to hit the ground running with a standardized look-n-feel across projects and don't mind extra kBs, prepare to embrace Bootstrap.
Minimalism and layout focus
Meanwhile, if your design requirements lean more towards a minimalist, layout-centric approach, Flexbox could be a better ally. It brings crucial tools for complex layouts, sans the framework baggage.
Performance and trade-offs
Performance is something you'd like to measure precisely. While Flexbox tends to be lighter being a CSS-only solution, Bootstrap comes heavy with multiple scripts.
Lightweight Flexbox
Flexbox results in lesser HTTP requests and aids performant designs. Each KB saved is a win!
The Bootstrap overhead
Bootstrap, laden with scripts, can potentially slow down rendering, something that you should measure and benchmark.
Coexistence: The best of both worlds?
It's not a binary choice between Bootstrap and Flexbox. They can coexist, complementing each other's strengths. You can achieve sophisticated layouts with Flexbox while using Bootstrap's components and utilities.
Catering to specific scenarios: Flexbox vs Bootstrap
Complex layouts with Flexbox
As your design complexity escalates, Flexbox is invaluable with properties such as flex-grow, flex-shrink, and flex-basis. It allows advanced responsive designs — somewhat of a daunting task with Bootstrap.
CSS Grid for larger layouts
Consider the two-dimensional CSS Grid for even larger, complex layouts, as Flexbox is inherently one-dimensional.
Fallbacks and accessibility
Ensure functional fallbacks such as display: table or absolute positioning for browsers that may not support Flexbox yet. It ensures your design stays accessible.
Custom versus ready-to-use components
Building your toolkit
Flexbox lets you custom-build a collection of reusable components according to your design constraints without carrying the burden of unutilized styles.
Ready out of the box
Bootstrap is the way to go for a quick, standard toolkit with lesser customizing overhead. It facilitates rapid development and ensures design consistency across multiple projects.
Was this article helpful?