Collections.emptylist() vs. new instance
Choose Collections.emptyList() for an immutable, singleton empty list that ensures efficient memory usage - ideal for static, unchanging lists.
Opt for new ArrayList<>() when the list might need to grow like Pinocchio's nose - it's a modifiable empty list.
Whether you pick Collections.emptyList() or an ArrayList instance boils down to your specific requirements for immutability and performance.
The nitty-gritty of immutability
Unveiling Collections.emptyList()
Collections.emptyList() isn't just a method - consider it the Ironman of Java: enforcing immutability for better code safety. For a list that's always going to be empty, this method guarantees it with the permanence of a superhero's moral compass.
The power of choice: List mutability
If your scenario is like a plot twist and might require modification, a new ArrayList instance could be your ally. By choosing this, you equip your list to be more adaptable to change.
The plot twist: List.of()
Java 9 introduced List.of(), a nifty overlord that creates an immutable list with any number of elements. This method is your go-to for immutable lists, especially when you need more than just an empty one.
Weighing the scenarios
Performance: every millisecond counts
Imagine needing to frequently call a method. Here's where Ironman - sorry, Collections.emptyList(), in its singleton glory, proves its mettle. By avoiding the task of creating new objects each time, you're using less system resources and achieving subtle but defining performance improvements.
It's all about memory
Because Collections.emptyList() is a singleton, memory allocation is not needed for every call - unlike its sibling, a new ArrayList instance. If you're running in a memory-constrained environment, this difference could be as significant as choosing between a bike or a jet for a quick trip to the store.
Flexibility in typing
Working with generic types and need a typed immutable empty list? Make use of Collections.<Foo>emptyList(). Because a strongly strategic move, like a good chess opening, is always a good idea.
Best practices
Immutable fields and return types
When working with unchangeable fields in a class or methods promising an empty list, like a politician's promise never to raise taxes, using Collections.emptyList() is safest. You avoid unexpected modification of the list, keeping your code's integrity intact.
Making a room for uncertainty
In cases where the list might need to accommodate unforeseen modifications, creating a new ArrayList instance is like a jack-of-all-trades — versatile and flexible.
Boosting thread safety
Choosing Collections.emptyList() in a multi-threaded context is like being the only driver on a desolate highway — safe and predictable. That's the magic of its immutable nature.
Was this article helpful?