Why when a constructor is annotated with @JsonCreator, its arguments must be annotated with @JsonProperty?

java

reflection

deserialization

jackson

byAlex Kataev·Jan 28, 2025

In Jackson deserialization, @JsonProperty works hand-in-hand with @JsonCreator for a crystal clear standards mapping. It ties JSON fields to constructor parameters in an expressive manner. This particularly shines when parameter names aren't visible at runtime due to bytecode quirks. JSON-to-Java accuracy? That's the magic of these annotations!

Example:

public class Player {
    private final String gamerTag;

    @JsonCreator
    public User(@JsonProperty("gamerTag") String gamerTag) {
        this.gamerTag = gamerTag;
        // "Call me Ishmael...or whatever the JSON field says. 🐳"
    }
}

@JsonProperty("gamerTag") ensures Jackson maps the JSON field gamerTag to our constructor parameter—setting the stage for creating Player objects straight from JSON. Now that's leveling up!

Overcoming Jackson's reflection limitations

The reflection issue with bytecode

Ever found a sock without its pair? In Java bytecode, our constructor's parameter names run off and hide. 😅 This can turn into a wild chase if there are multiple constructors with different purposes. Thankfully, Jackson's serde mechanism isn't left in the dust, as it requires a solid bindings map between JSON properties and Java constructor parameters.

Jackson Modules to the rescue

For java 8 and later, the -parameters compiler flag helps hold onto parameter names, cutting back on our annotations' word count. Also, jackson-module-parameter-names capitalizes on this info to prevent constructor parameters from needing @JsonProperty annotations.

Without these fancy settings or for pre-Java 8 code, third-party libraries, like ParaNamer, or annotations, like java.beans.ConstructorProperties, swoop in. They guide Jackson with either alternative reflection capabilities or clear mapping instructions, leading JSON down the constructor path.

Optimizing deserialization techniques

Annotations aren't the only tool

Classic getters and setters can also be leveraged. With them, Jackson can count on default naming strategies to find the dance partner for each JSON field, completely bypassing the need for constructor annotations.

Jackson's registration bonus

If we register modules like jackson-module-parameter-names, Jackson then gains a proverbial backstage pass to the constructor parameter names' green room. This cuts out the need for extra annotations. It's Jackson’s golden ticket to nail mapping and handle deserialization like a pro.

Handling edge cases with third-party libraries

Teaming up with third-party classes

Often, we pair Jackson with libraries that don't carry Jackson's 'annotations luggage'. Use @ConstructorProperties or module registrations to bolster Jackson's combat compatibility with such third-party libraries, ducking out of manual JSON parsing battles.

Watch out for version compatibility traps

Leveraging modules or flags like -parameters might hit you with version inconsistencies or environmental differences. Always be prepared for these attacks and fortify deserialization's consistency across all setups.

Exploring alternative Java annotations

Bored with @JsonProperty? With jackson-module-parameter-names you dust off those constructor parameters without @JsonProperty.

And if you're dealing with non-Jackson-friendly classes, java.beans.ConstructorProperties is your go-to. You call out constructor properties to Jackson via a standard-based approach

Libraries like Lombok combine with Jackson annotations to automate boilerplate chores and define data models without a headache.

Ensuring Jackson deserialization resilience

It can be hurtful when -parameters is inconsistently applied. As you count on it for parameter names, it's crucial your gonna keep an eye that your IDE and build tools uniformly apply it.

When deploying across different systems, that's when we gird ourselves for module registration. Verifying them can save serious trouble, avoiding unexpected Jackson deserialization failures.

During code reviews, seeking out @JsonProperty and its related annotations is priority one. Only then can we prevent sneaky serialization issues elusive to automated tests.

explain-codes / Java / Why when a constructor is annotated with @JsonCreator, its arguments must be annotated with @JsonProperty?

Linked

Different names of JSON property during serialization and deserialization



Jackson with JSON: Unrecognized field, not marked as ignorable



How can I tell jackson to ignore a property for which I don't have control over the source code?



Only using @JsonIgnore during serialization, but not deserialization



How to change a field name in JSON using Jackson

