What is (are) the differences between NOLOCK and UNCOMMITTED
In SQL Server, NOLOCK and READ UNCOMMITTED hints provide the same functionality. They allow your queries to bypass the usual locking mechanisms, enabling interaction with data that's still in-transit or not yet committed. This results in dirty reads and can speed up queries but with the trade-off of possibly inaccurate data.
The above syntax allows fetching data that includes uncommitted changes from the Employees table.
Remember, though potentially faster, both hints can lead to a litany of problems like non-repeatable reads, phantom data, or even data overwrite. Heed caution when using them, and bear in mind they are not magical performance boosters, and are not suited for all scenarios.
Locking effects in action
In SQL Server, NOLOCK and READ UNCOMMITTED don't just allow for dirty reads, but they also shift how and where locking happens.
- NOLOCK applies directly at the table level in a one-off query hint.
- READ UNCOMMITTED, set as a transaction isolation level, impacts all proceeding queries in that transaction.
And just like eating the forbidden fruit, using these hints can lead to some unexpected outcomes:
- Non-repeatable reads: Running a query multiple times within a transaction can yield different results (Schrodinger's data, so to speak π±βοΈ).
- Phantoms: Seeing data during a transaction that eventually doesnβt exist after the transaction is complete - a bit like SQL's version of a ghost story π».
- Lost updates: Risk of a query overwrite a concurrent transaction's update, which may be rolled back later. It's similar to writing an essay, only to have it deleted before saving.
The alternatives and best practices
While NOLOCK and READ UNCOMMITTED can improve query performance, don't let this blind you to their integrity risk. Think of them as a speedboat - fast indeed, but not much use if there's a hole in the bottom!
Before using, consider your scenario:
- Transaction criticality: Use hints sparingly and only for non-critical tasks such as background sync or report generation.
- Alternatives: Explore other options like
SNAPSHOTisolation that provide statement-level data consistency without risking dirty reads. - Isolation Levels: For stricter data accuracy, consider isolation levels like
REPEATABLE READorSERIALIZABLE.
Where to use cautiously
If used judiciously, NOLOCK and READ UNCOMMITTED can offer value in certain scenarios:
- Reporting: Beneficial for generating business reports that require near-real-time, though not absolutely consistent data.
- High throughput systems: Useful in applications where the need for speed trumps perfectly accurate data (yes, SQL Server won't play the waiting game π¦).
- Data Analysis: Handy when scouring for broad data patterns or aggregations and transaction-level accuracy isn't the mission.
Was this article helpful?