What are the pros and cons of performing calculations in sql vs. in your application

sql

database-performance

sql-vs-java

data-transfer

byAnton Shumikhin·Mar 10, 2025

Doing calculations in SQL shines for basic set-based operations like SUM, COUNT, or leveraging indices with your WHERE conditions. In contrast, Java excels for intricate logic, beyond SQL's reach, or for managing real-time processing based on user interactions. SQL reduces network load by crunching numbers on-site, whereas Java's flexibility comes in handy for complex algorithms and combining multiple data sources.

// Darth Vader's Death Star total budget 
// (Do you think this is a lot or not enough for a space station? 🚀)
//SQL variant
SELECT SUM(total_price) FROM sales WHERE year = 2021;

// Java with a touch of streams, like a calm river 🌊
// total Death Star's expenditures
BigDecimal total = salesList.stream()
                            .filter(s -> s.getYear() == 2021)
                            .map(Sale::getPrice)
                            .reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);

Use SQL for high-efficiency and data-centric problems; Java for tailored processing and robust logic.

SQL Calculations: When to use?

SQL performs best with large data quantities, as it sends only the final result over the network, saving bandwidth. Furthermore, SQL makes filtering rows efficient due to precise arithmetic operations provided by RDBMS's exact numeric types.

Utilizing indexes is another strength of SQL. A well-indexed column can drastically slash query times, making calculations over millions of rows a breeze.

For aggregate calculations, SQL often trumps Java, courtesy of its set-based design. Functions like AVG, SUM, MIN, MAX and complex queries with window functions can leverage SQL’s processing power, an area where Java struggles to compete.

Java Calculations: When to use?

Java stands out for operations that are either too complex for SQL or require algorithmic logic beyond SQL’s expressive power. These scenarios include calculations relying on conditional logic, concurrent processes, or situations where calculations are nested within a larger, more complex workflow.

Java's vast library ecosystem offers a plethora of handy tools and frameworks that can simplify complex tasks. Moreover, Java's code clarity and maintainability shine when you need to refactor or update an application.

For limited data sets, Java can leverage in-memory processing speeds, bypassing the trip to the database server altogether.

Optimal Blend: A Hybrid Approach

In some situations, a hybrid approach offers the best of both worlds. Compute intermediate results in SQL to reduce data transfer, then further process these results in your application for complex business logic. This blend can yield an optimal architecture for intricate systems.

PL/pgSQL and other server-side scripting languages can augment SQL's calculation abilities. By packing complex operations into stored procedures, these calculations can be executed efficiently on the database server—keeping data traffic to a minimum.

Visualization

Comparing SQL vs. Java in terms of factory processing metaphor:

Raw Materials (📊 Data)
      |
      |   Factory A (🏭 SQL)
      |       |
      |       |---📈 Bulk operations processed efficiently
      |       |---🛃 Built-in functions & optimizations
      |       |---🚀 Reduced data transfer (Fewer trips!)
      |
      |
      |   Factory B (🤖 Java Application)
      |       |
      |       |---🛠️ Custom processing & complex logic
      |       |---🔄 Easier refactoring & maintenance
      |       |---👾 Rich ecosystem of libraries & tools

Takeaway:

SQL: Specialist factory 🏭— high efficiency, bulk processing.
Java: Versatile workshop 🤖— custom, intricate tasks.

Quick Overview: Pros & Cons

When contemplating between performing calculations in SQL or your application, consider these pros and cons:

Pros for SQL:

Efficient at set-based calculations
Reduces data transfer over the network
Excellent for leveraging indices

Cons for SQL:

Limited to SQL expressiveness
Risk to overload the database with complex calculations
Extensive SQL knowledge needed for optimal queries

Pros for Java:

Flexibility in implementing complex logic
High performance concurrent processing
Robust library ecosystem

Cons for Java:

Potential increase in data transfer between the DB and app
Higher memory consumption for large datasets
Can be slow for aggregate functions

Considerations for Performance

The performance of SQL and Java implementations can change significantly depending on your use case. Comparing the two approaches considering typical usage patterns can help find the superior path forward.

Caching can be a game-changer for both SQL and Java when dealing with computationally expensive operations. Implementing caching strategies can mitigate performance concerns and reduce load on both the application and database servers.

Furthermore, hardware capabilities should be accounted for when deciding where to perform calculations. High-performance application servers may handle complex logic better, while a robust database server might excel in processing large datasets with efficiency.

explain-codes / Sql / What are the pros and cons of performing calculations in sql vs. in your application

Linked

Preparedstatement with list of parameters in a IN clause



What are the benefits of using database cursor?



Sql Joins Vs SQL Subqueries (Performance)?



Does the order of where clauses matter in SQL?



Filter by COUNT(*)?

