Volatile Vs Atomic

java

concurrency

atomicity

volatile-variables

byNikita Barsukov·Aug 23, 2024

Volatile certifies the consistency of variable access across threads by communicating the value to memory promptly on each write. Yet, it stumbles when working with non-atomic operations such as incrementing, which mandate simultaneous reading and writing.

For these compound operations to take place uninterruptedly and accurately, Atomic classes are invaluable. Take, for example, AtomicInteger, which manages concurrent increments flawlessly, leaving no room for confusion owing to race conditions:

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

AtomicInteger atomicCounter = new AtomicInteger(0);

// Safe atomic increment
int newValue = atomicCounter.incrementAndGet();
// Java here acting like Black Widow from Avengers: "I never miss."

With incrementAndGet(), every increment operation is lock-free, ensuring flawless results even under the pressures of concurrent access.

Diving into Visibility and Atomicity

Recognizing the concepts of visibility and atomicity forms the backbone of creating robust concurrent Java applications. When volatile is in action, all threads can access the most recent value of the variable:

volatile int sharedVariable = 0;
// Think of it like a Twitter feed where everyone sees the latest tweet

However, if two threads try to increment this volatile sharedVariable at the same time, both may see the same value before they write back the newer one, causing a loss of updates – a classic example of a race condition.

In contrast, AtomicInteger and other classes from the java.util.concurrent.atomic package offer operations with a thread-safe guarantee, maintaining visibility and atomicity due to their compare-and-set (CAS) mechanics:

AtomicInteger atomicVariable = new AtomicInteger(0);
// Java's secret sauce to avoid concurrency mishaps

With the atomicVariable, increments do not collide, thanks to the underlying lock-free CAS operation.

The right situation for volatile

Volatile variables offer two significant benefits:

They ensure memory visibility by establishing a happen-before relationship with subsequent reads of the same variable.
They prevent instruction reordering in concurrent situations, which can lead to significant performance improvements.

Yet, volatile has its limitations:

It's not feasible for compound operations (like check-then-act sequences) as it cannot guarantee atomicity for those.
For 64-bit data types (like long and double), the volatile keyword is required to enable atomicity, as these operations take place in two steps for non-volatile variables.

How atomic variables operate

Atomic classes such as AtomicInteger, AtomicLong, and AtomicReference offer a spectrum of atomic operations like:

getAndSet()
getAndIncrement()
getAndDecrement()
incrementAndGet()

These methods encapsulate complex behaviors that would otherwise require warranty through synchronization. Not to forget, they offer fine control over state changes with operations like compareAndSet(expectedValue, updateValue), highly valuable in non-blocking algorithms and other concurrent data structures.

Deciding between the two

The decision between using volatile and Atomic variables is often influenced by the specific use-case scenario:

If you're dealing with simple flags or state indicators where you only require to read or write a single value, volatile would suffice.
When you have compound actions to perform, like i++, which need to be conducted safely in a multi-threaded environment, Atomic variables come to rescue.

Do remember, atomic operations typically come with a higher overhead than volatile reads and writes due to their more complex undertakings.

Traps and Considerations

There are a few potential pitfalls to be aware of when working with these constructs:

False sharing: Atomic variables can come under the hammer of false sharing, if not rightly padded, at the processor cache line level.
Memory overhead: Every Atomic object holds additional memory overhead as opposed to a volatile variable, a significant factor when dealing with large arrays. Helps you understand why Java developers are so meticulous about memory management.
Garbage Collection: Excessive usage of Atomic objects can put your garbage collector under strain.

And of course, your arsenal for tackling advanced problems, like lock-free programming, non-blocking algorithms, and understanding the nuts and bolts of CAS loops is likely to benefit from a deep understanding of volatile and atomic operations.

explain-codes / Java / Volatile Vs Atomic

Linked

What is the volatile keyword useful for?



Difference between volatile and synchronized in Java



Is "Java Concurrency In Practice" still valid?



Java synchronized method lock on object, or method?



What does 'synchronized' mean?

