Explain Codes LogoExplain Codes Logo

Using Mockito to mock classes with generic parameters

java
mockito
generics
testing
Nikita BarsukovbyNikita Barsukov·Oct 26, 2024
TLDR

Utilize Mockito's mock() method with a type-safe capture to accurately mock generic classes. This method leverages the TypeToken class from Google's Gson library. Create an anonymous inner class to specify the generic parameter.

// that's how you say 'Hello World' in Mockito with generics. MyClass<Foo> myClassMock = mock((Class<MyClass<Foo>>)(Class<?>)new TypeToken<MyClass<Foo>>() {}.getRawType());

By doing this, you maintain type integrity, crucial for methods that return a generic type, ensuring your mock's behavior stays under checkmate!

Core techniques to mock with generics

The journey of mocking generic classes can be full of pitfalls, if not done properly. However, it's never a zero-sum game; every technique provides a balance between ease of implementation and robustness.

Casting: Use it, don't abuse it

Casting might seem like a skill that you can cast off quite freely, always remember to suppress compiler warnings only when safe. Use the @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") annotation judiciously, don't let it become your Invisibility Cloak!

Leveraging @Mock and MockitoJUnitRunner

Mockito's annotations such as @Mock can help navigate the tricky seas of mock initialization. Along with MockitoJUnitRunner or MockitoExtension, these annotations set sail the ship of automated mock object initialization.

Creating subclasses: Specificity is Key

Sometimes it's cleaner to carve your own path. Creating a specific subclass or implementing an interface with a specific generic type gives you the liberty of greater detail without the need for casting, maintaining type safety.

Utility methods: The ace up your sleeve

Mocking generics too often? It's time to create a utility method. Centralize this logic, reduce code duplication and watch your test codebase become cleaner and more maintainable.

Choosing the right tool

When faced with a casting decision, us programmers often get stuck. Should we create intermediate classes? Interfaces? Or use the mock() method directly? The key is considering the context of suppressed warnings and evaluating risks.

The Good, the Bad and the Mocks

  • Type Safety: With refined mocking techniques, type safety is like that best friend who's always got your back.
  • Code clarity: Well-implemented mocks with generics add a sparkle of clarity, making your tests readable and maintainable.
  • Testing versatility: Robust generic mocks flexibly simulate a wider range of behaviors, ensuring a deep-dive into the ocean of testing scenarios.

Avoiding Generic disasters

  • Ignoring Errors: Careless silence of compiler warnings can lead to subtle and elusive bugs in your test suite.
  • Misusing Casting: Casting is a fine skill, implemented only when the type relations are crystal clear.
  • Redundant Code: Overdoing boilerplate code for mocking generics can make your test code seem bloated and repetitive.

Best practices

  • Regular Review: Stay updated with the Mockito documentation and popular community practices.
  • Clean Coding: Simplify your test code, minimize casts, and maintain clarity.
  • Risk Minimization: Suppress warnings with caution and consider risks to maintain a risk-free test code.