Should a "static final Logger" be declared in UPPER-CASE?

Uppercase or Lowercase? That is the question.

In Java, uppercase labels are used for immutable constants. These are static final fields with a constant, unchanging value known at compile-time.

//As constant and immovable as a mountain... or a mountain goat.
public static final String CONSTANT_NAME = "ImmutableValue";


But a logger instance is mutable. It changes state during the application lifecycle, which is a stark contrast to our unchanging, mountain-like constant.

Understanding mutable vs. immutable

Static final fields can be split into two families: the immutable objects and the mutable folks.

• Immutable family: Members like String and primitives live here. They enjoy UPPER_CASE as they never change.

//Max connections is fixed, like the number of slices in a pizza. You wish there were more, but there aren't.
public static final int MAX_CONNECTIONS = 50;


• Mutable folks: Logger instances belong here. Despite being popular, they maintain a low profile with lowercase.

//... because we like our loggers like we like our coffee - strong, bold, and down-to-earth.
private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyClass.class);


Tools and standards adherence

Automated code tools like PMD or Checkstyle endorse naming conventions that improve readability and maintainability. They aren't fond of uppercase for mutable static final fields -- they think it's a big no-no.

Consider your logging framework

Different logging frameworks might go against the grain. SLF4J can be flexible (LOGGER or logger), whereas Log4J or Java's Util Logging really prefer to see logger.

// SLF4J style
// LOGGER is like that one friend who sometimes prefers their full name, rather than their nick
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyClass.class);

// Log4J/Common logging style
// Logger is more laid-back; they're cool with just their first name
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(MyClass.class);


Balancing your framework convention with practices for mutable and immutable static final fields will yield a beautiful, readable code your team will treasure.

Navigating the seas of consistency

Continuity across your project is a lighthouse in a storm. Stick with LOGGER if that's the norm around you, or logger if that floats your boat. Uniform code is a treat for new contributors or late-night bug fixes.

When you swim into a legacy codebase's waters, where LOGGER and logger fight for dominance, ensure you document your choice and guide future coders.

Finding style guide treasure maps

Style guides are a goldmine of wisdom curated by experienced developers. They show the lands of best practices and code clarity.

• Oracle Java Code Conventions
• Google Java Style Guide

Visualizing "Static Final Logger Naming Convention":

Think of your codebase as a toolbox:

🧰 Code Toolbox
  - 🔨 Hammer (Common Tool)
  - 🪛 Screwdriver (Common Tool)
  - static_final_logger (Specialist Tool)

Naming Convention Insight:

- 🧰 Common tools (variables): `lowerCamelCase`
- 🔧 Specialist tool (static final Logger): `LOGGER` or `logger`

The Logger is a purpose-specific tool. Traditional Java Naming:

🔧 UPPERCASE: When Immutable & Universal
🪓 lowercase: When mutable & frequent-use

Pick readability and standardization over inflexible dogma. 📘👁️