Remove None value from a list without removing the 0 value
Ruby-slippers-level magic trick: eliminate None
but keep 0
in your list with this one-line list comprehension:
Just like that: Bye-bye, None
. Hello, 0.
Get practical: Cases and nuances
Stepping back for a sec: treating None
and 0
differently is crucial in Python. None
is non-existence, 0
is an important integer. Let's get serious and dive into the heart of the beast for some practical insights.
Performance optimization over large lists
List comprehension triumphs with large lists, but extremely large data sets may need more complexity or parallel processing. Here be dragons, proceed with caution!
Order, order!
Both the order and the number of elements (looking at you, percentile calculations!) can take a hit when you remove None
. Your solution preserves the order. You've kept the peace.
Tricky zero - More difficult than taking candy from a baby
Avoid filter(None, L)
like dodging spoilers. It launches 0
and None
into the void. It confuses 0
for False
and causes all sorts of mayhem.
When the stars don't align: Alternative solutions
Alright, list comprehensions are cool, but what if you want to check out the scenary on the road less travelled? Let's explore the wild side.
Lambda: the unsung hero
Kick things up a notch with filter
and lambda:
This solution works inline and doesn't need any additional imports. Pity Bob, 'cause you don't need to list()
your way out in Python 2.
functools and operator in a love triangle with None
Feeling fancy? Mix partial
from the functools
, casually brought together with a dash of is_not
from the operator
.
This might be like using a bazooka to swat a fly, but elegance has a price.
Custom filter: a beacon of clarity
A little verbosity for clarity never hurt anyone:
Who needs brevity when you can read your own code, right?
Was this article helpful?