Explain Codes LogoExplain Codes Logo

Print list without brackets in a single row

python
list-manipulation
string-conversion
performance-optimization
Nikita BarsukovbyNikita Barsukov·Mar 3, 2025
TLDR

For printing a list without brackets, use the join() function with a list comprehension or the map() function:

# Don't worry, "map" doesn't mean we're going hiking print(' '.join(map(str, [1, 2, 3])))

The output will be: 1 2 3

If you're dealing with a list of strings, you can give map() a break:

# Finally, no translating numbers to strings! print(' '.join(["apple", "banana", "cherry"]))

The output will be: apple banana cherry

Converting data types

Encountered your fair share of data types in a list? No problem! Convert all of them to string:

mixed_list = [1, 'apple', 3.14] # Karate chop your worries away with map()! print(' '.join(map(str, mixed_list)))

The output will be: 1 apple 3.14

Custom separator soup

Looking to separate your printed list items with a comma? Consider it done:

numbers = [1, 2, 3] # Add more flavor to your soup with commas! print(', '.join(map(str, numbers)))

Output: 1, 2, 3

They're not strings? Use list comprehension instead:

# No strings attached! print(', '.join(str(num) for num in numbers))

The magical power of element unpacking

Love the convenience of * operator and the sep parameter? They've got your back:

# Who needs a clone spell when you have *? print(*numbers, sep=", ")

Output: 1, 2, 3

The great thing? No need for pretentious string conversions, print() can handle it all.

Roadblocks to dodge

Use caution when:

  • Using a comma as a separator without a succeeding space
  • Converting non-string values to string without using map() or list comprehension
  • Dealing with nested lists — they want their own spotlight

The Method Dilemma

Caught between sep versus join()? Keep these guiding lights handy:

  • join(): Need a single string output or passing to another function
  • sep: Working with multiple arguments in print function

Adjusting to output needs

Need to customize your output further that mirrors slicing the output of str(list) but without the brackets?

# Who knew slicing lists could be this much fun? numbers_str = str(numbers)[1:-1] print(numbers_str)

Output: 1, 2, 3

Check your list size though, large lists might make it less efficient.

Thinking about efficiency vs. elegance

The join() method is more elegant, but not always the most efficient. When dealing with large lists, the unpacking method could be your savior.

Less is more

When coding, readability is king. Code with too many explanations may lose its essence. Strive for simplicity.

Optimizing like a pro

In performance-intensive applications:

  • Always test different methods
  • Make a trade-off between performance opportunity vs aesthetic code
  • For lists with uniform data types, direct methods like the unpacking operator (*) may be quicker