How do I prevent the modification of a private field in a class?
⚡TLDR
To protect a private field
enforce its declaration with final
and by omitting setters. For mutable collections such as lists or arrays, adopt a defensive copying strategy in your getters:
Above method ensures immutability and non-modifiability of our vaccineList
.
The magic potion of immutability
For arrays or collections, meticulous measures will fortify the protection of your private fields:
Putting handcuffs on lists
- Use a read-only scope for your lists to thwart any unwelcome modifications. The magic tool?
Collections.unmodifiableList()
.
This lock-down shields the list from being adulterated.
Arrays and their bodyguards
- For arrays, clone them or resort to
Arrays.copyOf()
to ensure a fresh copy is served in getters:
This creates a new body double each time, leaving the original untouched.
Null values: The unwanted guests
- When implementing defensive copies, it's vital to build robustness against null references:
Efficiency: A love for Arrays
- If memory conservation is crucial,
Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(arr))
serves an immutable presentation without making a duplicate of the underlying array.
Protecting array data: Tactics and Patterns
Ensuring property safety extends beyond mere insight and necessitates strategizing:
Immutable Objects
- Reflect upon Guava's
ImmutableList
or comparable library resources for deeper immutability, often providing more optimized solutions than pure Java.
Defensive Copying vs. Immutable Views
- There's a subtle contrast between creating a copy of the complete structure (defensive copying) and providing a read-only mask (immutable view). The former yields an entirely separate structure, the latter cloaks the existing one.
Deeper into the rabbit hole: Advanced insights
Privatizing fields drastically hinges upon tackling edge cases and considering alternatives:
Reference Leaks: The Traitors
- Be aware of public access points that unintentionally leak internal structure, such as methods returning array lengths or exposing elements directly.
Protection Fails: The Decoys
- Comprehend the limitations of
private
keyword. It only guards the field's reference, not the object's contents it's pointing at.
Null Protection: The Ghost Busters
- Always assume that your arrays or lists could be
null
. Implement null checks and return empty structures to preventNullPointerException
.
Linked
Linked
Was this article helpful?