Difference between Spring @Controller and @RestController annotation
In Spring, @Controller
& @RestController
serve unique purposes. The former is primarily for web applications, returning view templates, whereas the latter is perfect for RESTful web services, promptly returning object data formatted as JSON or XML.
For @Controller
, you'd typically return a ModelAndView
. Think of it as a courier delivering a package (view) to your door:
On the other hand, with @RestController
, methods return data objects, conveniently auto-serialized into JSON/XML:
Choosing between @Controller and @RestController
When dealing with response type and your application needs, your choice between @Controller
and @RestController
becomes crucial. If you're tackling a traditional web application, where the server-side is rendering the page, then @Controller
is your star player. However, if you're venturing into the world of API development with RESTful services, where the data is often supplied to non-browser clients, you'd want to recruit @RestController
on your team.
@RestController - not just a @Controller
Yes, @RestController
is actually @Controller
on steroids. It's a convenience annotation that rolls @Controller
and @ResponseBody
into one. This means that the return value of the mapped method is sent directly into the response body, not interpreted as a view name.
Here's a simple mnemonic:
- Recruit
@RestController
for your RESTful web services where sending JSON or XML responses swiftly is paramount. - Stick with
@Controller
if you're knee deep in dynamic page rendering with server-side templates like Thymeleaf or JSP.
The added magic of @RestController
Taking @Controller
a notch higher, @RestController
saves you from the repetitive task of annotating each handler method with @ResponseBody
when your endgame is creating a RESTful service. A win for code brevity and maintenance!
Using Views with REST: the @Controller way
In a Web MVC environment, @Controller
is a crowd favorite. However, to return data instead of a view, you need to pair the handler methods with @ResponseBody
, signalling to Spring that the return type should be written as-is into the HTTP response body.
RESTful service with @RestController
Run a REST API like a boss with @RestController
- no @ResponseBody
necessary on individual handler methods. Free from nuisances of view-related configurations, @RestController
allows you to focus on designing your REST API's endpoints.
Embracing advanced scenarios
Async processing in Spring MVC applications? No problem. Both @Controller
and @RestController
have got your back. They can handle asynchronous request processing by returning Callable
or DeferredResult
. This is especially handy when managing long-running tasks in your REST APIs.
Working with HTTP Requests
Wondering about dealing with custom headers or status codes? @Controller
& @RestController
can easily leverage the @ResponseStatus
and @RequestHeader
for this. To handle request entities, you've got @RequestBody
on your side, able to retrieve the body of the HTTP request, regardless of your choice of annotation.
Considering security
Both @Controller
and @RestController
work harmoniously with Spring Security. When binding @RestController
with REST APIs, remember to consider statelessness and usage of tokens like JWT for authentication as it's the norm in RESTful architecture.
The importance of proactive learning
Check the latest Javadoc and Spring guides regularly! Understanding subtle differences and updates related to these annotations is key as Spring evolves frequently. Keeping yourself updated ensures you're using the best practices and remain in sync with the latest Spring frameworkβs offerings.
Customising your approach
For global exception handling and data binding customizations across the whole application or for specific packages or controllers, consider integrating with the advice mechanisms such as @ControllerAdvice
or @RestControllerAdvice
.
Was this article helpful?