Datetime2 vs DateTime in SQL Server
Prefer DateTime2
when you need a broader date range (0001-01-01 to 9999-12-31) and finer precision (up to 100 nanoseconds). Stick with DateTime
for legacy systems, due to compatibility requirements, otherwise DateTime2
would be an ideal choice - enabling precision, and catering to vast historical dates too:
Hence, DateTime2
not only offers future-proofing, but also precision and range.
Efficient storage & precision management
Every byte counts! Choose DateTime2
for potential storage savings. By controlling the precision level, from 0 to 7, you can vary the storage space between 6 to 8 bytes. The fixed 8 bytes for DateTime
seems comparably inflexible:
Compliance with SQL standards
Respect the standards! DateTime2
aligns with the SQL standard, ensuring compatibility and maintaining standards hygiene. When collaborating with .NET applications, it's crucial to harmonize System.DateTime
with DateTime2
to avoid any rounding-off nightmares:
Catering to unique data scenarios
Go global with datetimeoffset
, the ideal choice for time zone awareness. When you're dealing with only dates or times, consider using DATE
and TIME
data types respectively, optimizing space consumption further.
Safe calculations & Legacy compatibility
Particular operations like calculating age or scheduling tasks require precise date manipulations. The precision of DateTime2
proves beneficial here. Just remember to use the correct functions, like DateAdd
:
However, if you're still living with dinosaurs 🦕 in legacy systems, you would need to stick with DateTime
to avoid disruptive, haunting compatibility issues!
Threading on data type conversion paths
Be wary when casting between datetime
and datetime2
as you may lose precision. In case you try to downcast DateTime2
to DateTime
, be ready for fractions of seconds getting chopped off:
Such precision loss could be devastating, especially for systems that rely on precise timestamps, such as logging or synchronization services.
Was this article helpful?