Completablefuture | thenApply vs thenCompose
Use thenApply
when the transformation of a CompletableFuture
's result is synchronous. It's great for direct, snappy transformations.
Opt for thenCompose
when you need to marry two stages of asynchronous computation into a smooth workflow. It's your best friend when the next operation also yields a CompletableFuture
.
Example:
Simply put, thenApply
gives results quickly, while thenCompose
allows you to set up a sequence of events.
The real deal: thenApply vs thenCompose
The thenApply
is comparable to map
operations in Optional
or Stream
. It's a handy function for working with the direct result of a CompletableFuture
and provides a transformed result encapsulated in a new CompletableFuture
. Its like turning water into wine!
On the flip side, thenCompose
aligns with flatMap
; it enables flattening and chaining operations. When wrestling with a function that yields another CompletableFuture
or CompletionStage
, it allows you to create a dependent future without sweating over a CompletableFuture<CompletableFuture<T>>
.
To put it simply:
-
thenApply
: for all your synchronous, transformational needs. -
thenCompose
: for logical next steps involving extra asynchronous operations.
Knowing when to use thenApply or thenCompose
-
thenApply
: Utilize this method when you want to sprinkle some transformational magic on the result of theCompletableFuture
. -
thenCompose
: When your transformation function also gives you aCompletableFuture
that you'd like to flatten, choose this. It's like ordering a flat white instead of a frothy cappuccino.
The synchronous vs asynchronous conundrum
thenApply
doesn't handle nesting within CompletableFutures. It's built for those quick-and-simple synchronous transformations.
thenCompose
, on the other hand, works wonders for asynchronous operations. It's your knight in shining armor for recursive async operations or an unknown succession of operation chains.
Practical magic
Imagine this: you need to fetch a user and then, based on the user's data, fetch their orders. Sounds familiar?
Here's the equivalent synchronous scenario with thenApply
:
Wrestling with nested futures
thenCompose
is your best bet when dealing with functions that generate a CompletionStage
. It's your secret weapon to avoid nested futures and maintain a clean, linear future.
Consider this nested future predicament:
To untangle the nested knots, deploy thenCompose
:
Exploring alternatives
The latest Java updates serve other methods like thenCombine
and thenAcceptBoth
for amalgamating independent futures. These methods are your comrades in arms, handling parallel asynchronous operations that don't vie for each other's results.
Navigation through complex workflows
In more complex flows, you'll often see multiple thenApply
and thenCompose
calls chained together:
In this snippet, you see both synchronous and asynchronous steps leading to a calculated result.
Was this article helpful?