Are loops really faster in reverse?

A deep dive into loop performance

Assessing loop performance

A reverse loop with i-- may appear more efficient as it seems to bypass the length property re-evaluation. However, with modern JavaScript engines like V8, such differences are pretty much trivial for most applications.

Counting backwards: Advantages and disadvantages

In the early days of JavaScript, reverse loops were faster as they omitted the .length property access in each iteration - a meaningful factor back then.

// A common forward loop with cached length
for (let i = 0, len = array.length; i < len; i++) {
  // "Running so fast, I'm catching my tail." - Array Element
}


Nonetheless, JavaScript engines have thick skins now and property access has been heavily optimized, leaving the performance gain from reverse loops miniscule.

Low-level versus high-level languages

In high-level languages like JavaScript, the core logic inside the loop tends to govern the overall execution time more than the direction of the loop. For low-level languages, we see different tactics like loop unrolling having more influence.

Modern JavaScript: Built-in functions, the secret sauce

Modern JavaScript comes packed with higher-order functions like array.forEach() and array.map(), offering cleaner syntax and according potential performance gains due to engine optimizations.

// forEach for cleaner syntax, potential optimizations
array.forEach(element => {
  // "Multi-tasking: Screw up several things at once." - Anonymous
});


Different browsers may have different performance profiles. Thus, benchmarking in your specific context is essential: HTML collections and native arrays can behave distinctly due to their underlying implementation.

Optimizing loop performance

Understanding JavaScript engines

JavaScript engines employ various strategies to enhance execution speed such as shape and inline caching. A clear understanding of these can provide a fair idea of how loop performance might be impacted.

Performance impact of external libraries

Before opting for manual optimization, consider using robust JavaScript libraries. Many of them provide pre-optimized, complex looping tasks.

Benchmarking: the ultimate test

For an accurate and contemporary performance measure, you should refer to the most recent benchmarks. Older tests might not reflect the latest browser-specific optimization strategies.

Evaluating browser-dependent behaviors

As different browsers utilize unique optimization strategies for JavaScript execution, loop performance can vary. Therefore, cross-browser testing is imperative for performance-critical code.